Petition Letter: Concerning the Future of Edinburgh’s Central Library and the City’s World Heritage Status
We the undersigned, backed by over 5000 signatures of public support, wish to register an expression of “No Confidence” in the City of Edinburgh Council, in response to the proposal for a highly contentious development at India Buildings on Victoria Street, following a spate of controversial planning decisions whose cumulative effects are seriously damaging the reputation of this City of the Enlightenment, putting Edinburgh’s highest accolade at risk, the World Heritage status.
Previously in 2014, thousands objected to the speculative Caltongate/ New Waverley development, whose form now speaks for itself, so out of keeping with Edinburgh’s Old Town. Numerous other major planning controversies have since emerged such as the Royal High School, Craighouse, St Andrew Square, St James Centre etc, which have put great strain on communities and undermined public faith in the planning process.
The case of India Buildings is the latest controversy, one of seven developments the International Council on Monuments and Sites has voiced ‘strong concerns’, believing that a ‘serious investigation is merited’. UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, holds the government ultimately responsible for the care of World Heritage and warns there is an “ongoing threat” to Edinburgh’s world heritage status, stating:
“Regrettably the current situation… appears to have tipped the balance inappropriately, away from con-servation, towards inappropriate development. There is an urgent need to reconsider, revise and re-frame current approaches to development… so as to deliver greater focus on values, to incorporate appropriate expertise and to improve engagement with the community.”
The Old Town community consider the case of the India Buildings as blatantly representing ‘inappropriate development’, regarding the Council’s planning report to have been ‘significantly flawed’. Contrary to the report, which claims “the design of the new building is respectful”, local residents consider the proposed development will have a massive detrimental impact on the Old Town, which already endures excessive congestion, noise, and air pollution, in breach of EU regulations.
With a Council over a billion pounds in in debt, due to a litany of maladministration (trams, PFI schools, statutory repairs etc), while contending with the imposition of ‘austerity’, caused by the chicanery of the global banking system, Edinburgh Council is currently sanctioning the asset stripping of the City, without any public consent or consultation to determine alternative options.
The proposed India Buildings ‘development’ involves the disposal of significant public assets, including the historic B listed Cowgatehead Church, which has been used as an NHS clinic for many years, serving the needs of the most vulnerable in the community. Against the wishes of staff and clients, the clinic would be relocated and the church converted to an entertainment venue integrated into the hotel, adding to the over-provision of licensed venues that encourage the late night anti-social behaviour that has impinged so much on the quality of life of local residents in recent years.
Most controversially, the proposed hotel would extend to the Cowgate on public land long set aside for the benefit of the City, to extend the Central Library and re-vision this key public asset as a major cultural hub and literary centre, in recognition of Edinburgh’s title as the first UNESCO World City of Literature.
With the original building reaching capacity, this land would safeguard the Library’s future and honour the aspiration of founder, Scots born Andrew Carnegie, whose remarkable legacy established many thousands of public libraries throughout the World, and who desired that the Central Library, “grow in usefulness, and prove one of the most potent agencies for the good of the people of Edinburgh for all time to come”.
If the hotel is built, the bulk of the building would significantly overshadow the Library, reducing natural light by up to 80%. For the finest Carnegie library in the country, this would be an appalling indictment for such a significant building: a beacon of The Enlightenment, purposely designed to maximise natural light, whose motto above the main entrance proclaims, ‘Let There Be Light’!
As an alternative proposal, awakened by the temerity of the hotel developer, the local community, backed by thousands of signatures in support of the petition “Let There Be Light In Edinburgh’s Old Town”, wish to acquire and develop the public assets for the benefit of the Nation, using crowd source funding and the Community Empowerment Act, realising a World class re-visioning of the Library, in recognition of Andrew Carnegie.
All local councillors have voiced strong objections to the proposed hotel, underscored by the local MP who has recently expressed ‘serious concerns’, asking for a thorough reconsideration of the application. In upholding integrity and honouring the primary duty of acting in the best interests of Citizens, We remind the Council of the pledge that was made at the beginning of the current term of office:
“We… need to recognise that there has been a breakdown in trust between the residents of Edinburgh and their elected representatives on the Council. That relationship needs to be repaired… this new contract with the capital marks a fresh start, with a Council willing to listen to local people and work together with local communities… A council where co-operation, fairness, accountability and responsibility really matter. The City will be able to judge the Council against this promise”.
In light of this case and others, We judge that the Council has betrayed its promise. Having lost faith in the local authority, Ministers at the Scottish Parliament have now been approached. However, requests to intervene have thus far been declined, with officials claiming that, “there are no issues of national significance that would justify using the power of call-in in this particular case” and would ”only consider intervening in cases that raised issues of genuine national as opposed to local interest.”
In recognising that one of the most important public buildings in the country is under considerable threat, together with the World Heritage status and indeed the very future of the living community of this ancient neighbourhood at the heart of the Nation, now in ‘perilous decline’ due to the affect of commercial pressures, We the undersigned resolutely contend that this matter is of the utmost “genuine national” significance.
For a government committed to ’empower individuals and communities’, and a parliament guided by ‘Wisdom, Justice, Compassion, and Integrity’, We therefore earnestly ask the Scottish Government to make an exceptional intervention in support of community empowerment and the realisation of this brilliant, ‘once in a civilisation’ opportunity, of enriching this City of Literature, World Heritage and Enlightenment.
A Citizen led vision for the Central Library would reciprocate the ‘potent agency’ of an institution representing among the highest attainments of modern civilisation, reaffirming and redefining the essential relevance of the public library service, far beyond monetary measure; a home for life long learning, literature, culture and excellence, at the centre of community, for the benefit of all, ‘for all time to come’.
For the Love of Edina, ‘Let There Be Light’,
* Besides not adequately addressing the many issues of objection, the planning report contained insufficient, misleading and contradictory information. Moreover, key information recently obtained through Freedom of Information requests was withheld from the report.
This information relates to the listing of the Central Library which had been recommended for upgrade to Category A in 2002, to afford greater protection to the building and recognition of its national, and indeed international, significance. Though this recommendation was officially endorsed by the Council in 2005, the Central Library continued to remain a B listed building until planning consent had been granted to the proposed hotel, ten years later in May 2016. This reveals a serious dereliction of duty and clear conflict of interest by the Council.
Had the Library been afford the protection of category ’A’ listing, consent for the proposed hotel would have been REFUSED.
“A library outranks any other one thing a community can do to benefit its people. It is a never failing spring in the desert. There is not such a cradle of democracy upon the earth as the Free Public Library; this republic of letters, where neither rank, office, nor wealth receives the slightest consideration.” – Andrew Carnegie